Monday, May 18, 2020

Buddhism - An Analysis


Buddhism
Buddhism is a nontheistic religion that encompasses a variety of traditions, beliefs and practices largely based on teachings attributed to Siddhartha Gautama, who is commonly known as the Buddha, meaning "the awakened one". According to Buddhist tradition, the Buddha lived and taught in the eastern part of the Indian subcontinent sometime between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE. He is recognized by Buddhists as an awakened or enlightened teacher who shared his insights to help sentient beings end their suffering through the elimination of ignorance and craving by way of understanding and the seeing of dependent origination, with the ultimate goal of attainment of the sublime state of nirvana.
Two major branches of Buddhism are generally recognized: Theravada ("The School of the Elders") and Mahayana ("The Great Vehicle"). Theravada has a widespread following in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia (Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Myanmar etc.). Mahayana is found throughout East Asia (China, Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Singapore, Taiwan etc.) and includes the traditions of Pure Land, Zen, Nichiren Buddhism, Tibetan Buddhism, Shingon, and Tiantai (Tendai). In some classifications, Vajrayana—practiced mainly in Tibet and Mongolia, and adjacent parts of China and Russia—is recognized as a third branch, while others classify it as a part of Mahayana.
 HINAYANA
Hinayana  is a Sanskrit term literally meaning: the Inferior Vehicle, Deficient Vehicle, the Abandoned Vehicle, or the Defective Vehicle, applied to the Sravakayana, the Buddhist path followed by a sravaka who wishes to become an arhat. The word Hinayana is formed of hina means little,poor,inferior,and yana is vehicle.vehicle means a way of going to enlightenment.  The term appeared around the 1st or 2nd century. Hinayana is often contrasted with Mahayana, which means the "Great Vehicle." There are a variety of interpretations as to who or what the term "Hinayana" refers to. Both adopt one and the same Vinaya, and they have in common the prohibitions of the five offenses, and also the practice of the Four Noble Truths. Those who venerate the bodhisattvas and read the Mahayana sutras are called the Mahayanists, while those who do not perform these are called the Hinayanists. The terms Hinayana (Lesser Vehicle or Modest Vehicle) originated in the Prajnaparamita Sutras (The Sutras on Far-Reaching Discriminating Awareness, The Perfection of Wisdom Sutras). They are a rather derogatory pair of words, aggrandizing Mahayana and putting down Hinayana.

                     Hinayana encompasses eighteen schools. The most important for our purposes are Sarvastivada and Theravada. Theravada is the one extant today in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia. Sarvastivada was widespread in Northern India when the Tibetans started to travel there and Buddhism began to be transplanted to Tibet.There were two main divisions of Sarvastivada based on philosophical differences: Vaibhashika and Sautrantika. Hinayana tenet systems studied at the Indian monastic universities such as Nalanda, and later by the Tibetan Mahayanists, are from these two schools. The lineage of monastic vows followed in Tibet is from another Sarvastivada subdivision, Mulasarvastivada

 MAHAYANA

Mahayana is a Sanskrit word Mahayana, literally means the “Great Vehicle”. Mahayana is one of the two main existing branches of Buddhism and a term for classification of Buddhist philosophies and practice. Mahayana Buddhism originated in India, and some scholars believe that it was initially associated with one of the oldest historical branches of Buddhism. The Mahayana tradition is the largest major tradition of Buddhism existing today. According to the teachings of Mahayana traditions, “Mahayana” also refers to the path of seeking complete enlightenment for the benefit of all sentient beings, also called “Bodhisattvayana”, or the "Bodhisattva Vehicle”. In the course of its history, Mahayana Buddhism spread from India to various other Asian countries.[1]
                  Major traditions of Mahayana Buddhism today include Zen, Chinese Chán, Pure Land, Tiantai, and Nichiren. It also includes the Vajrayana Buddhist traditions of Shingon, Tendai and Tibetan Buddhism, which add esoteric teachings to the Mahayana tradition. The term Mahayana "Great Vehicle" was originally an honorary synonym for Bodhisattvayana ie Bodhisattva Vehicle .The vehicle of a bodhisattva seeking Buddha hood for the benefit of all sentient beings.The term Mahayana was therefore formed independently at an early date as a synonym for the path and the teachings of the bodhisattvas. Since it was simply an honorary term for Bodhisattvayana, the creation of the term Mahayana and its application to Bodhisattvayana did not represent a significant turning point in the development of a Mahayana tradition.The terms Mahayana (Greater Vehicle or Vast Vehicle) originated in the Prajnaparamita Sutras (The Sutras on Far-Reaching Discriminating Awareness, The Perfection of Wisdom Sutras). They are a rather derogatory pair of words, aggrandizing Mahayana and putting down Hinayana.

COMPARISON OF HINAYANA AND MAHAYANA
            Both Hinayana and Mahayana agree that a seeing pathway mind rids both arya shravakas and arya bodhisattvas of doctrinally based disturbing emotions, while an accustoming pathway mind rids them of automatically arising disturbing emotions. The former are based on learning the set of assertions of one of the non-Buddhist Indian schools, while the latter arise automatically in everyone, including animals. The list of disturbing emotions that shravaka and bodhisattva aryas rid them of is part of a larger list of mental factors. Each of the Hinayana schools has its own list of mental factors, while Mahayana asserts yet another list. Many of the mental factors are defined differently in each list.

Both Hinayana and Mahayana agree that the course of progressing through the five pathway minds entails practicing the thirty-seven factors leading to a purified state. A “purified state” or “ bodhi” refers to either arhataship or Buddhahood. These thirty-seven factors include the four close placements of mindfulness, the eight branches of an arya pathway mind (the eightfold noble path), and so on. They are very important. In anuttarayoga tantra, the thrity-seven are represented by Yamantaka’s thirty-four arms plus his body, speech and mind, as well as by the dakinis in the body mandala of Vajrayogini. The thirty-seven are a standard set of practices. The specifics of each practice, however, are often different in Hinayana and Mahayana.[2]

Both Hinayana and Mahayana assert that the scheme of stream-enterer, once-returner, non-returner and arhat refers to stages of an arya shravaka’s path, but not to the path of an arya bodhisattva. Hinayana does not provide an extensive explanation of the bodhisattva pathway minds. Mahayana explains that an arya bodhisattva’s path to enlightenment entails progressing through the development of ten levels of bhumi-mind. These levels of mind do not pertain to the path of shravakas. Both Hinayana and Mahayana agree that traversing the bodhisattva path to enlightenment takes more time than traversing the shravaka one to arhatship.

Both Hinayana and Mahayana teach the practice of the four immeasurable attitudes of love, compassion, joy, and equanimity. Both are defininig love as the wish for others to have happiness and the causes of happiness, and compassion as the wish for them to be free of suffering and the causes of suffering. Hinayana  does not develop these immeasurable attitudes through a line of reasoning  such as that all beings have been our mother and so on. Rather, it starts by directing love at those whom we already love and then extending it, in stages, toward a widening range of others.

The definitions of immeasurable joy and equanimity are different in Hinayana and Mahayana. In Hinayana, immeasurable joy refers to rejoicing in the happiness of others, without any jealousy, and wishing it to increase. In Mahayana, immeasurable joy is the wish that others have the joy of unending enlightenment.

Equanimity is the state of mind that is free from attachment, repulsion, and indifference. In Theravada, it is equanimity toward the outcome of our love, compassion, and rejoicing. The outcome of our attempts to help others really depends on their karma and their efforts; although, as with Mahayana, Theravada accepts the possibility of a transfer of positive force, “merit,” to others.In Mahayana, immeasurable equanimity means wishing all others to be free of attachment, repulsion and indifference, because these disturbing emotions and attitudes bring them suffering.
The bodhichitta aim is the state of mind to attain enlightenment oneself, in order to fulfill the goal of that exceptional resolve. Since Hinayana contains little elaboration on the bodhisattva path, it does not explain these two attitudes. Mahayana outlines in great detail the meditation practices for developing them.
Hinayana emphasizes development of the four immeasurable attitudes as a way to overcome their opposing disturbing emotions in one self.  Love is the opponent of ill-will; it temporarily frees oneself from thoughts of enmity, aggression or annoyance, and anxiety or fear. Compassion is the opponent of having a cruel or harmful attitude. Joy or rejoicing is the opponent for jealousy, and equanimity is the opponent of expectation, worry or disappointment, and indifference. In Mahayana, the emphasis is on what others experience, rather than on what oneself experiences toward them.
            Hinayana does not assert the lack of an impossible “soul” of phenomena, or voidness, it is not the case that Hinayana does not discuss the nature of all phenomena in general. Hinayana does this with its presentation of the two truths concerning all phenomena. The precursor to gaining an understanding of the voidness of phenomena is an understanding the two truths. In Mahayana, the two truths are two facts concerning the same phenomenon. In Hinayana, the two truths are two sets of phenomena. There are superficial or conventional true phenomena and deepest or ultimate true phenomena.[3]
Bodhisatva Ideal
The figure of the Bodhisattva — one who seeks Enlightenment for the sake of all beings — is central to Mahayana Buddhism. The Bodhisattva Ideal lays special emphasis on compassion as essential to the Buddhist path. Drawing on all aspects of the Buddhist tradition, Sangharakshita’s main emphasis is on the earlier and most basic teachings of the Buddha (which precede the Mahayana). However, he suggests that the Bodhisattva ideal is a central aspect of Buddhism as a whole, and that its expression by the Mahayana is not a later development but the reassertion of something that was implicit in the Buddha’s teaching from beginning. Transcendental Wisdom necessarily includes Compassion.

Mahāyāna Buddhism is based principally upon the path of a bodhisattva. According to Jan Nattier, the term Mahāyāna ("Great Vehicle") was originally even an honorary synonym for Bodhisattvayāna, or the "Bodhisattva Vehicle." The Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra contains a simple and brief definition for the term bodhisattva, which is also the earliest known Mahāyāna definition. This definition is given as the following.[4]
Because he has enlightenment as his aim, a bodhisattva-mahāsattva is so called.
Mahāyāna Buddhism encourages everyone to become bodhisattvas and to take the bodhisattva vows. With these vows, one makes the promise to work for the complete enlightenment of all sentient beings by practicing the six perfections. Indelibly entwined with the bodhisattva vow is merit transference (pariṇāmanā).
In Mahāyāna Buddhism life in this world is compared to people living in a house that is on fire. People take this world as reality pursuing worldly projects and pleasures without realizing that the house is on fire and will soon burn down (due to the inevitability of death). A bodhisattva is one who has a determination to free sentient beings from samsara and its cycle of death, rebirth and suffering. This type of mind is known as the mind of awakening (bodhicitta). Bodhisattvas take bodhisattva vows in order to progress on the spiritual path towards buddhahood.[5]
There are a variety of different conceptions of the nature of a bodhisattva in Mahāyāna. According to some Mahāyāna sources a bodhisattva is someone on the path to full Buddhahood. Others speak of bodhisattvas renouncing Buddhahood. According to the Kun-bzang bla-ma'i zhal-lung, a bodhisattva can choose any of three paths to help sentient beings in the process of achieving buddhahood. They are:
1.     king-like bodhisattva - one who aspires to become buddha as soon as possible and then help sentient beings in full fledge;
2.     boatman-like bodhisattva - one who aspires to achieve buddhahood along with other sentient beings and
3.     Shepherd-like bodhisattva - one who aspires to delay buddhahood until all other sentient beings achieve buddhahood. Bodhisattvas like Avalokiteśvara andŚāntideva are believed to fall in this category.
According to the doctrine of some Tibetan schools (like Theravāda but for different reasons), only the first of these is recognized. It is held that Buddhas remain in the world, able to help others, so there is no point in delay. Geshe Kelsang Gyatso notes:
In reality, the second two types of bodhicitta are wishes that are impossible to fulfill because it is only possible to lead others to enlightenment once we have attained enlightenment our self. Therefore, only king-like bodhicitta is actual bodhicitta. Je Tsongkhapa says that although the other Bodhisattvas wish for that which is impossible, their attitude is sublime and unmistaken.
The Nyingma school, however, holds that the lowest level is the way of the king, who primarily seeks his own benefit but who recognizes that his benefit depends crucially on that of his kingdom and his subjects. The middle level is the path of the boatman, who ferries his passengers across the river and simultaneously, of course, ferries himself as well. The highest level is that of the shepherd, who makes sure that all his sheep arrive safely ahead of him and places their welfare above his own.
Ten grounds
According to many traditions within Mahayana Buddhism, on the way to becoming a Buddha, a bodhisattva proceeds through ten, or sometimes fourteen, grounds or bhumis. Before a bodhisattva arrives at the first ground, he or she first must travel the first two of the five paths:
The path of accumulation
The path of preparation
The ten grounds of the bodhisattva then can be grouped into the next three paths
Bhumi 1 the path of insight, Bhumis 2-7 the path of meditation, Bhumis 8-10 the path of no more learning
The chapter of ten grounds in the Avataṃsaka Sutra refers to 52 stages. The 10 grounds are:
Great Joy: It is said that being close to enlightenment and seeing the benefit for all sentient beings, one achieves great joy, hence the name. In this bhumi the bodhisattvas practice all perfections, but especially emphasizing generosity (dana).
Stainless: In accomplishing the second bhumi, the bodhisattva is free from the stains of immorality; therefore, this bhumi is named "stainless". The emphasized perfection is moral discipline (sila).
Luminous: The third bhumi is named "luminous", because, for a bodhisattva who accomplishes this bhumi, the light of Dharma is said to radiate for others from the bodhisattva. The emphasized perfection is patience (kṣanti).
Radiant: This bhumi is called "radiant", because it is said to be like a radiating light that fully burns that which opposes enlightenment. The emphasized perfection is vigor (virya).
Very difficult to train: Bodhisattvas who attain this bhumi strive to help sentient beings attain maturity, and do not become emotionally involved when such beings respond negatively, both of which are difficult to do. The emphasized perfection is meditative concentration (dhyana).
Obviously Transcendent: By depending on the perfection of wisdom, the bodhisattva does not abide in either saṃsara or nirvaṇa, so this state is "obviously transcendent". The emphasized perfection is wisdom (prajna).
Gone afar:  It emphasis on the perfection of skillful means (upaya), to help others.
Immovable: The emphasized virtue is aspiration. This, the "immovable" bhumi, is the bhumi at which one becomes able to choose his place of rebirth.
Good Discriminating Wisdom: The emphasized virtue is power.
Cloud of Dharma: The emphasized virtue is the practice of primordial wisdom.
After the ten bhumis, according to Mahayana Buddhism, one attains complete enlightenment and becomes a Buddha.
Neo Buddhism
Neo Buddhism is a modern Buddhist revivalist movement in India. As a popular movement, Neo-Buddhism Began on Oct 14, 1956 when B.R. Ambedkar, the 20th century’s most prominent Untouchable converted to Buddhism along with nearly 600,000 of his followers. Born as an untouchable, Ambedkar was not an exception to face and experience the same humiliation and tribulation, which every untouchable had to face in those days. He struggled continuously to face poverty and untouchablity.[6] In his own words: “Owing to the poverty of my father I did not have the opportunity to enjoy any of these luxuries. Till late in life I suffered excessively and labored very hard.” He had seen people not having sufficient food to eat; women with no clothes to cover their bodies; no roof over their heads to give them shelter; no land to grow food grains. They were oppressed and exploited; they had no dignity, no value at all.
Originality in Buddhism
After a "close study of all religions" for 35 years, Ambedkar was convinced that the novelty of teachings, leadership qualities, scientific temper, logical arguments make "Religion of the Buddha", the ideal religion for the "modern man who knows science". He was convinced that "Buddhism was the only religion" which could save society "awakened by science" and "without which the society would perish".
One of the reasons for the "slow advance of Buddhism", according to Ambedkar, is its vast literature, and the other hurdle in its growth is that "it has no such thing as a Bible, as the Christians have". It was to fill this gap that he undertook the task of writingThe Buddha and His Dhamma in a lucid and clear way. He based his book on Ashvaghosha’s Buddhavitta (Buddhacharita). The manuscript was completed just three days before his death.[7]
Though in all humility, Ambedkar does not claim any originality and says that his book is a product of "compilation and assembly plant", his treatment of the issues relating to Buddhism is quite novel, logical and clear. He does not brush aside the vexing questions relating to Buddhism but takes them head on. For example, he rejects the popular theory that Buddha became a recluse after seeing a sick, an old and a dead body and advocates a more authentic version of it. He also refutes the commonly held view that Buddhism is a pessimistic religion, and shows how the Buddha is able to reconcile between his doctrine of Anatamvada — no soul theory, and the doctrine of Karma. Finally, he also dwells on the need, necessity and role of Bhikkus — monks in Buddhism.
He not only explains the expressions used by the Buddha but also uses current terminology to give it a constructive, critical and modern interpretation. For instance, while explaining the notion of conversion, he makes a distinction between the "conversion to the order of Bhikkus called Sangha" and "conversion of a householder as an Upaska or lay follower of the Buddha’s Dhamma". The norms for the two are different. While Bhikkus can be punished for violation of the norms, for the Upaska they are just precepts. Pokka (Upeksha), one of the virtues taught by Buddha, is interpreted by Ambedkar not as indifference as is usually done but as detachment. This interpretation gives a new dimension to the virtue Upeksha.[8]
Ambedkar wrote the book for the laity in the form of serially numbered aphorisms and, therefore, he did not much care to mention the references and sources on which he based his interpretation. Due to his untimely death, he could not complete the Preface and even polish the language before its publication. He was criticised for not including the citations and was accused of fabricating "sources in support of his ideology".
Bodhisattva Babasaheb Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
Ambedkar delivering a speech to a rally at Yeola, Nashik, on 13 October 1935, At the Yeola conference in 1935, prominent Indian leader and first law minister B. R. Ambedkar declared that he would not die a Hindu, saying that it perpetuates caste injustices. Ambedkar was approached by various leaders of different denominations and faiths. Meetings were held to discuss the question of Dalit religion and the pros and cons of conversion. On 22 May 1936, an "All Religious Conference" was held at Lucknow. It was attended by prominent Dalit leaders including Jagjivan Ram, though Ambedkar could not attend it. At the conference, Muslim, Christian, Sikh, and Buddhist representatives presented the tenets of their respective religions in an effort to win over Dalits.
Buddhist monk Lokanatha visited Ambedkar's residence at Dadar on 10 June 1936 and tried to persuade him to embrace Buddhism. Later in an interview to the press, Lokanatha said that Ambedkar was impressed with Buddhism and that his own ambition was to convert all Dalits to Buddhism. In 1937, Lokanatha published a pamphlet Buddhism Will Make You Free, dedicated to the "Depressed Classes" of India from his press in Ceylon.[9]
In early 1940s, Ambedkar visited Acharya Ishvardatt Medharthi's Buddhpuri school in Kanpur. Medharthi had earlier been initiated into Buddhism byLokanatha, and by the mid-1940s, he had close contacts with Ambedkar. For a short while, Ambedkar also took Pali classes from Medharthi in Delhi.
Bodhananda Mahastvir and B. R. Ambedkar first met in 1926, at the "Indian Non-Brahmin Conference" convened by Shahu IV of Kolhapur. They met on two more occasions and for a short while in the 1940s, where they discussed dhamma. Mahastavir objected to Dr Ambedkar's second marriage because his bride was a Brahmin. Later, his followers actively participated in Ambedkar's Republican Party of India.
Ambedkar's conversion
After publishing a series of books and articles arguing that Buddhism was the only way for the Untouchables to gain equality, Ambedkar publicly converted on 14 October 1956, atDeekshabhoomiNagpur. He took the three refuges and the Five Precepts from a Buddhist monk, Bhadant U Chandramani, in the traditional manner, and in his turn administered them to the 600,000 of his followers who were present. The conversion ceremony was attended by Medharthi, his main disciple Bhoj Dev Mudit, and Mahastvir Bodhanand's Sri Lankan successor, Bhante Pragyanand. Ambedkar would die less than two months later, just after finishing his definitive work on Buddhism.
Many Dalits employ the term "Ambedkar(ite) Buddhism" to designate the Buddhist movement, which started with Ambedkar's conversion. Many converted people call themselves "-Bauddha" i.e. Buddhists.
22 Vows of Ambedkar[10]
Inscription of 22 vows at Deekshabhoomi, Nagpur
After receiving ordination, Ambedkar gave dhamma diksha to his followers. The ceremony included 22 vows given to all new converts after Three Jewels and Five Precepts. On 14 October 1956, Ambedkar performed another mass religious conversion ceremony at Chanda.
He prescribed 22 vows to his followers:
1.     I shall have no faith in BrahmaVishnu and Maheshwara nor shall I worship them.
2.     I shall have no faith in Rama and Krishna, who are believed to be incarnation of God, nor shall I worship them.
3.     I shall have no faith in GauriGanapati and other gods and goddesses of Hindus nor shall I worship them.
4.     I do not believe in the incarnation of God.
5.     I do not and shall not believe that Lord Buddha was the incarnation of Vishnu. I believe this to be sheer madness and false propaganda.
6.     I shall not perform Shraddha nor shall I give pind.
7.     I shall not act in a manner violating the principles and teachings of the Buddha.
8.     I shall not allow any ceremonies to be performed by Brahmins.
9.     I shall believe in the equality of man.
10. I shall Endeavour to establish equality.
11. I shall follow the noble eightfold path of the Buddha.
12. I shall follow the ten paramitas prescribed by the Buddha.
13. I shall have compassion and loving-kindness for all living beings and protect them.
14. I shall not steal.
15. I shall not tell lies.
16. I shall not commit carnal sins.
17. I shall not take intoxicants like liquor, drugs, etc.
18. I shall Endeavour to follow the noble eightfold path and practice compassion and loving-kindness in everyday life.
19. I renounce Hinduism, which disfavors humanity and impedes the advancement and development of humanity because it is based on inequality, and adopt Buddhism as my religion.
20. I firmly believe the Dhamma of the Buddha is the only true religion.
21. I consider that I have taken a new birth.
22. I solemnly declare and affirm that I shall hereafter lead my life according to the teachings of Buddha's Dhamma.
Conclusion
            Buddhism is one of the nontheistic religions in the world. It accepts everyone and gives equal priority to everyone in the society. Major theme of Buddhism is to attain nirvana. It gives more importance to those who are under privileged and untouchables in the society. Through this paper we could understand the value and importance of Buddhism.
Bibliography
Chalam, K S. Relevance of Ambedkarism in India. New Delhi: Rawat Publications, 1996.
Christmas, Humphreys. The Wisdom of Buddhism. London: Curzon Press Pvt Ltd,1979.
David, E.R. Buddhism as in Performance. New Delhi: D K Print World, 1999.
Edwerd Conze. Buddhism. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers,1994.
Narasu, Lakshmi P. The Essence of Buddhism. New Delhi: Asian educational Services, 1985.


[1] Christmas Humphreys, The Wisdom Of Buddhism (London: Curzon Press Pvt Ltd,1979) , 113-114.
[2] David E.R, Buddhism as in Performance (New Delhi: D K Print World, 1999), 63-68.
[3] Edwerd Conze, Buddhism  (New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, 1994), 121-122.
[4] Ibid, 135.
[5] David E.R, Buddhism as in Performance (New Delhi: D K Print World, 1999), 69.
[6] K S Chalam,Relevance of Ambedkarism in India. (New Delhi: Rawat Publications, 1996), 46.
[7] K S Chalam, Relevance of Ambedkarism in India. (New Delhi: Rawat Publications, 1996), 48.
[8] Edwerd Conze, Buddhism (New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, 1994), 124.
[9] Christmas Humphreys,The Wisdom Of Buddhism(London:Curzon Press Pvt Ltd,1979),115.
[10] K S Chalam Relevance of Ambedkarism in India. (New Delhi: Rawat Publications, 1996), 55.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Current Post

எதையும் கண்டுகொள்ளாமல் இருப்பது ஒரு கலை! அதை கற்க 5 சுலபமான வழிகள்!

 எதையும் கண்டுகொள்ளாமல் இருப்பது ஒரு கலை! அதை கற்க 5 சுலபமான வழிகள்! உங்க அமைதியை குலைக்காத/கெடுக்காத எண்ணங்களை மட்டும் தேர்ந்தெடுங்கள்...! ...