Introduction:
The name mikaya “who is like YHWH” occurs eleven
times in the OT. The best known bearer
of this name is the prophet Micha, born around 750 B.C.E., from Moresheth-Gath,
a philistine town in the present day Gazea strip. Michah is known in history as a farmer prophet.
He stands up for the rural population against the elite of the city of
Jerusalem. This ruling class enslaves
peasants when they are no longer able to pay their debts. In rough, bold language Micah gives the
exploiters a piece of his mind.
According to Micah they are those “who tear the sking from off my
people, and their flesh form their bones; who ear the flesh of my people, and
flay their skin from off them, and break their bones in pieces, and chop them
up like meat in a kettle, like flesh in a caldron”. Even king Hezekiah also is
moved by the preaching of Micah. Even a
century after Micah’s appearance, people in Jerusalem remember his
message. The rest of micha’s life is a mystery.
The book of Micah
Division
Nowadays
a division of the book of micha into chapters 1-5 and 6-7 is widely
accepted. The second part is supposed to
originate not with Micah from moresheth, but with a namesake of his in the noth
of Israel or considered to be an editorial mosaic of texts from post exilic
times.
The main thrust of the
message of the book of Micah
The
principal difference between micah and his opponents lies in the way they
appropriate the YHWH traditions.
Strictly speaking Micah adversaries are not unorthodox nor do they deny
any religious truth. It is more the way
they deal with the religious inheritance of Israel that pars them from Micah,
Micah’s antagonists made god’s revealedtruth a static, impersonal, a historical
ideology, a kind of instant religion applicable in their own favour in any way,
at any time and anywhere. Micah however is convinced that the word of god has
its own time and place.
Theology of the book of Micah on the basis of
keywords
Theophany
Micah
is acquainted with the old Israelite tradition of theophany. It consists of three elements
- God’s coming
- Cosmic reactions to this coming
- God’s salvific intervention.
Social criticism
Micah
social criticism is primarily aimed at the abuse of power for money by rulers,
especially with respect to the expropriation of peasants land and houses.
Micah’s vision of the future implies that the peasants of Judah will recover
their expropriated land.
True and False prophets
Micah
stants in sharp contrast to the prophets connected with the priesthood and the
ruling class. The preaching of these
false prophets was based on the zion tradition that in their opinion
automatically guaranteed the safety of Jerusalem and its inhabitants. Its precisely this religious automatism,
inspired by supernatural selfishness, that makes them false prophets.
Micah 4:1-4
The
present text opens the discussion on three themes
- The future of Temple in Jerusalem(4:1-5, 9-13)
- The future of the people of God (4:4-5)
- The reunion of the divided kingdom under one
Davidic ruler (4:6-8)
The predominantly positive oracles are intermingles
with prophecies of doom on the downfall of Jerusalem and the humiliation of the
Davidic king. In contrast to his opponent Micah maintains that the
people of god will have to go through that depths of utter misery before
reaching salvation.
No comments:
Post a Comment