Thursday, May 7, 2020

Women in Early Church


Frankly I do not understand why Epicurus prefers to say that gods are like men,                                     rather than men are like gods. - Cicero[1]
1. Introduction
Women in Church history have played prominent roles in the life of Christianity even before  technical terms like Feminism[2], Patriarchy[3], Androcentrism[4], Misogyny[5] and Gynophobia[6] were unfamiliar/not-coined. Until recent times, women were generally excluded from episcopal and clerical positions within the Christian churches, however great numbers of women have been influential in the life of the church - from contemporaries of Jesus, to subsequent saints, theologians, doctors of the church, missionaries, abbesses, nuns, mystics, founders of religious institutes, military leaders, monarchs and martyrs. This paper aims to explain about the Women in early Church and their prominent roles.
1.1. Context and Structure
Christianity emerged from patriarchal societies that placed men in positions of authority in marriage, society and government, and, cunningly or cleverly the religion restricted membership of the priesthood to males only, in its early centuries it offered women an enhanced social status and quickly found a wide following among women.
From the early church time, the offices of teacher and sacramental minister were reserved for men throughout most of the church in the East and West. Later, as religious sisters and nuns, women came to play an important role in Christianity through convents and abbeys and have continued through history to be active - particularly in the establishment of schools, hospitals, nursing homes and monastic settlements. In recent decades, Ordination of women has become increasingly common in some Protestant churches but not in so called “Big Church”. Laywomen have also been highly active in the wider life of churches, supporting the community work of parishes.


2. Women in Judaism
In the first century, Judaism-so central to the development of Christianity reveals diverse perspectives on women and a wide range of practices. The dominant model of a virtuous woman was one who remained at home and obeyed her husband, a theme reflected in the book of Esther, for example. Women were not required to fulfil most religious obligations apart from dietary and sexual laws and the lighting of Sabbath candles.[7] Although we get only a glimpse of first-century Judaism from later rabbinic literature, strong continuities concerning attitudes toward women are present across the centuries. Many rabbis regarded women as socially and religiously inferior to men, and some even expressed contempt for them. Not only were men cautioned against speaking to women in public. but also women were not permitted to be witnesses in a court of law, nor were they to be counted in a quorum necessary for the formation of a synagogue congregation. At the temple in Jerusalem, they were to be restricted to an outer court; in the synagogues, they were to be seated separately and were not permitted to read aloud or to assume any public position. Perhaps most significant, they were not permitted to study the scriptures. One rabbi vigorously made this point when he wrote, “Rather should the words of the Torah be burned than to be entrusted to a woman.”[8] Yet there was disagreement among the rabbis themselves on some of these points. A minority argued that women should indeed study the Torah and that both women and men be permitted to initiate divorce proceedings. And of course the day-to-day reality of women’s lives often challenged official teaching. Women and men were forced, for example, to relate and communicate in public places simply to keep society functioning. Indeed, inscriptions from synagogues in various parts of the Roman Empire give woman leadership titles such as mother and elder.  Bernadette J. Brooten concludes that these titles were more than honorific; they reveal that women had liturgical, teaching, judicial and financial responsibilities.[9]
2.1. Domestic Life: In Jewish culture the women is considered as a person who stands under the instruction of a male next-of-kin most of her life. When she is a girl, she is dependent on her father, or if an orphan on her brother or other close kinsman. After marriage her husband becomes her master. Only if she is divorced or widowed does an oriental Jewish woman acquire a more or less independent status. She was even suppressed to express her views, for that even within the family circle; a woman had to take permission from her husband and father. Within the household women provide all kinds of free service to their children, husbands and others members of the family throughout their lives. However, their husbands and others could expropriate women’s labour. However, the Jewish women were received basic religious education at home. They were taught the oral ‘Halakar’ by teachers. Even though the words of Jewish women were accepted at home, their right of inheritance and right to divorce were seriously restricted.[10] 
2.2. Marriage and Sexuality: Women in the ancient Hebrew was expected to marry and bear children. Her primary duties were reproduction and nurturing, aimed at building up the household of her husband. An ideal wife is often portrayed as intelligent and resourceful but her fulfilment was found in serving her husband and particularly in supplying him with many sons. The Hebrew woman got married shortly after the onset of menstruation. Regarding the marriage of a Hebrew woman, a ‘Betrothal’ was arranged by their respective parents and contracted in binding agreement that could be severed only by formal divorce. A woman who entered into this agreement should remain clean, which means proof of the bride’s virginity was required, and she was expected to remain chaste as a wife.[11]
Divorce was common even among the devout Jews in the ancient Hebrew culture. However, two schools of thoughts in Judaism differ in this issue of divorce. The school of ‘Shammai ’ insisted that it was possible only in case of adultery, while the school of ‘Hiller’ maintained that there might be myriad reason, such as spinning in the street, talking with a stranger, a spoiled dinner, or lining another woman who was more attractive.[12] 
2.3. Socio-economic life: The Jewish women did all the domestic work within and outside the home. They ground the meal, baked the bread, cleaned and washed the cloths, as well as spinning, weaving and sewing garments for the family. However, outside the home, she fetched water from the village well, collected and gathered firewood, drove animals to the pastor and worked in the field. Within the community circle she might serve as midwife, nurse or attendant. Men controlled women’s labour ever outside the home. Even though women did a lot productive works, yet she was neither recognized nor paid for. Women were excluded from better-paid jobs, forced to sell their labour at very low rate and work within the family circle.[13] 
2.4. Religious Life: According to the Jewish rite women were allowed to enter the services but not particularly encouraged unlike their male counterpart, but enjoyed a better place than her gentile sister. The Jewish law did not considered women who had recently given birth as unclean and were not allowed to enter the worship service. The priesthood was restricted to women, but they have enjoyed some leadership as elders, leader of synagogue and mother of the synagogue at home. Regular attendance at the synagogue was not compulsory for women, they were seated in separate sections and their part in the services was strictly receptive. Even the oral reading of the scriptures was not given to women. Rabbis opposed women as teachers in schools and even in homes except as teachers of their own children.  This subordinate role of women in the patriarchal Israelite society led the Jewish women to a position of inferiority in the religious life.[14]
3. Women in Roman Society
Grew-Roman culture was dominated by an honour/shame ideology in which men was rewarded for public effort and achievement while women were to guard their “shame” or chastity by remaining obedient and secluded. Yet Roman women appeared freely in a variety of public places as well as managed their households. it was not unusual for wealthy women to be patrons of clubs, and both Greek and Roman women were accepted as priestesses and prophetesses. Women who had Roman citizenship enjoyed the economic security and social privileges of property ownership and inherited wealth In those portions of the empire more directly under the cultural influence of Rome the position of women was somewhat more free.[15]
3.1. Domestic Life: Roman women enjoyed much greater freedom in the domestic circle than the women in Judaism. She accorded deep respect and enjoyed a higher position in society. However, she was bound throughout her life to a male protector or tutor as father, husband or son. The consent of the tutor was nwessary for a woman to buy or sell property. to make a will or to negotiate a divorce. A Roman male citizen acted as household head and his wife oversaw the running of the household  according to his order. However widows of citizen men and a few independent wealthy women sewed as household heads with authority over other merchants.[16]
3.2. Marriage and Sexuality: The primary responsibility of a Roman woman was to marry and produce an heir, and every citizen women had to marry a citizen male. They were not allowed to exercise their power in marriage smce the marriage was ananged when she was about fourteen. In the Roman society prostitution was frequently of a high sordid nature. Adultery and divorce were common during the Imperial Rome.[17]
3.3. Socio-economic life: In social life women were allowed to accompany their husbands to certain public events. Wealthy women also contributed to civil causes by erecting baths, gymnasia, temples or statues for the use and enjoyment of the population as a whole. Their participation in civic affairs gave them a much deeper sense of civic responsibility. The education of women was considered important and desirable in the Roman society. Even within poor families both daughters and sons received at least a rudimentary education. Women in Roman society enjoyed much economic freedom. Their primary sources of income were to work in the textile industry. In the taverns they were innkeeper, barmaids and waitress. While in the theater they were actress, musicians, gymnasts and even gladiators. Many poor women and former slave women worked as vendors of various types goods such as salt, sesame seeds, fish.[18] Women shared a common status because they lived and worked in settings. 
3.4. Religious Life: In Rome many women took a prominent part in public activity, usually in religious settings. Often public games in honor of specific gods were presided over by patrician women. Many are recorded as having attained the highest priesthoods in the western portions of Asia. In the city of Rome itself the wife of the Pontifex Maximus took the lead in the worship of Bona Dea and when she died her husband had to resign his position. Female priests were also attached to the worship of Jupiter, Mars, Quirinus or Rex Sacrorum. The male priests in these same temples had to be married and also had to resign when their wives died.[19]
Roman women served as priestesses in the cults throughout the Empire, responsible for the sanctuary rituals and ceremonies, its maintenance, and its protection liturgically. They were also responsible for ritual sacrifices, pronouncing the prayers and presiding at the festivals of the deity. In some cases, women were identified as high priestesses. The positions and duties of Roman women show that, they were not religiously limited in the first centuries.[20]
Eventhough the Roman women enjoyed certain freedom, in general it could be said that, both Jewish and Greco-Roman culture, therefore, reinforced the silencing and subordination of women but at the same time made it possible for Christianity to accept active women members and powerful women leaders.[21] 
4. Prominent roles played by women in the early church and Women’s ministry.
Acts of the Apostles and other New Testament writings give a clear picture of the roles played by women in the early church. They played important roles as leaders in relief works, especially giving aids to the needy. They also played the role of Patron to certain congregations.  House churches were hosted by wealthy women comers, as in the early times, the believers gathered in homes for worship, exhortation and prayer. Women also functioned as prophets and teachers. Later the ministry of the word was understood as men‘s ministry and ministry of service was the arena of women. Prophesying was an area which was totally attributed to women in the early church.
4.1. Evangelists and House Church Leaders: Women were clearly involved in the spread of Christianity and in the establishment of new congregations. which met in private houses. In Romans l6, Paul refers to women who have been his coworkers in the evangelization of the Hellenistic world and commends Mary, Tryphaena. Tryphosa, and Persis for having “labored hard” in the Lord. In the same chapter, he pays tribute to the outstanding missionary work, including teaching doctrine to Apollo, of Priscilla and her husband Aquila. Priscilla‘s significance may be highlighted by the fact that she is mentioned before her husband in four out of six references, a literary device to suggest importance. Some biblical scholars believe that Priscilla’s role in teaching doctrine is reported without comment because it was not an unusual role for womeno In Phil. 4:2, Euodia and Syntyche are described as women who have worked or “struggled“ side by side with Paul. To emphasize their importance, Paul mentions them in the body of the letter rather than the salutation. There is no indication in these passages that women were subordinate to or dependent upon Paul‘s house churches were crucial to the success of the early mission efforts because they provided support and sustenance to the growing Christian congregations. They were the places in which the Lord's Supper was celebrated and the gospel preached. It is recorded that women provided the facilities for some groups, especially if the women were wealthy and prominent members of the community. Acts l6: l4, for example, mentions Lydia, a successful businesswoman who offered her house to the Christian church. She is baptized along with her household, which she appears to have ruled. Although many interpreters of the New Testament in the past have translated the name in Col. 4: l4 as the male name “Nymphas,” it is generally agreed that the verse correctly reads, “Nympha and the church in her house.” The house of Mary, the mother of John Mark , was also used in this way (Acts 12:12).“[22]
4.2. Deacons in the Early Church: Women were appointed as dcaconess as helpers for the male bishop, and also for women ministry in the early church. The church was instructed to use them as visitors to Christian women and as assistants in the baptismal rituals. They could teach the women and instruct them to keep the seal of baptism in purity and holiness. For this cause the ministry of woman deacons was especially needful and important. By the end of the third century women deacons were appointed by the Bishop form the entire congregation, although as time passed, they were required to be virgins or widows. The women deacons visited the sick women in their homes and anointed women at the time of baptism and also receive t m when they emerged from the ,They were regarded as part of the clergy, and were ordained in their clerical office. However they did not allowed to assist at the Lord’s supper.[23]
4.3. Female Prophets: Women tilled the role of prophet in the early churches. Prophets were not formally ordained or appointed by the congregations; rather, their authority was based on their reception of immediate revelation and inspiration from the Holy Spirit. Such revelation involved the clarification of texts, instruction in Christian living, and the discernment of God’s will for individuals and communities. In this way, women contributed to the construction of early Christian teaching. The Didache, a manual of church order from the second century, claims that the traveling prophets filled a role of great importance, some celebrating the Lord’s Supper. The four daughters of Philip were prophets (Acts 21:9) who ministered first in Caesarea and then moved to Hierapolis in Asia Minor. Montanus and two women, Priscilla and Maxima, led a religious movement that developed at the end of the second century. They continued the tradition that God speaks through believers cuter than church officials. Women such as Priscilla, whose oracles were collected and circulated in writing, were held in great honor as “prophetesses.”[24]
4.4. Widows: One role for women that is dealt with extensively in early Christian literature is that of widow.  originally widows were simply the worthy recipients of charity from churches, provided that they were known for their righteous lives and completely without other resources. by third century however, widows also began to appear in many places as members of a special “order” to which they were appointed. To qualify for this special appointment. a woman generally had to be over sixty years and married only once. Through church orders appealing to the authority of the apostles, leaders often tried to place the widows under the control of bishops and bring an end to some of their activities. The “good widows” were meek, silent and stayed at home-fixed, like the “altar of God”; a designation that shows how they were respected for their spiritual ministries. Eventually, the order of widows was absorbed into the much more highly controlled positions of deaconess and virgin.”[25]
4.5. Virgins: One group of women in the early church functioned in the office of “virgins”. These were the younger women or girls of the community who had been raised in the church homes. “They do not seem to have been assigned to any specific duties in connection with this title, but were considered as general assistants.”[26] By 3rd century they were fully organized into an office. There is evidence for this from numerous statements in the writings of the early Fathers in the Apostolic Age.
4.6. Missionary: The role of missionary in the early church was carried out by many women. Priscilla was one of the outstanding missionaries who involved in the spread of Christianity of new congregations. She was the wife of Aquila and they are always mentioned as a pair. They were important missionaries in Corinth and Ephesus. it is seen that sometimes Aquila is mentioned first. and sometimes Priscilla, which clearly suggests that they were genuine partners in ministry and that Priscilla was not Aquila’s subordinate. There is possibility that she worked alongside Aquila and Paul making tents. Ancient church father Origen said at Priscilla’s example legitimated women’s teaching ministry. A German scholar, Adolf Hamack suggested that Priscilla might be the unknown author of the anonymous epistle to the Hebrews.[27]
4.7. Apostles: From the First century women were indicated to have been apostles in the early church. They had an important place in the teachings and ministry of Jesus and this is confirmed in the linal days of his life were women not for him as apostles or as ones who are sent to bear witness to the gospel. One such example is Junias (Rom. l6:7). who is considered the first among the apostles. Andronicus and Junie are commended for their outstanding work in spreading the gospel. Again, translators in the past, finding it inconceivable that a woman would be called “apostle,” used the male name “Junias.” Junia. however, was a common female name in the lirst century, and church leaders as late as the medieval period had no problem accepting the female form. Judging from all the ancient records. there IS no evidence of the name Junias being used for male name at this time. Greatest scholars of today states that In all extant records there has never been a male Junia.[28] Gospel amounts of the risen Jesus also reveal that women could fulfill the requirements for the role of apostle.

4.8. Disciples: There were evidences for female disciple in the early church. Tabitha is an important person among the community at Joppa. She is identified as a disciple; the only woman explicitly identified as a disciple in Acts and is the only occurrence of the feminine form of disciple anywhere in the New Testament. She was deeply valued by the Joppa community for her good works and acts of charity.  She is also valued as a philanthropist, a woman mostly seemingly a window herself, who takes care of the needy, providing aid to many people mostly the poor and the widows out of her own resource. Her example of service to the people may have been the key instrument in developing church offices that focused on services.[29]
5. Conclusion
Christian art from the first and second centuries depicts women performing various ministerial activities, administering the Lord's Supper, teaching, baptizing, caring for the physical needs of the congregation and leading public prayers. cunningly or cleverly, when church was institutionalized women were excluded.
In comparing the timeline and by weighing women roles and their struggles  right from early Church to 21st century, we can clearly express that even though the prominent roles of women are inseparable, though the terms like Feminism, Patriarchy, etc. are aware or unaware, the struggle remains the same. It is our duty to express that again and again until the goal is achieved, especially in Church and Society today. As a matter of fact, this quote by Cicero totally fits even after 2000 years, Frankly I do not understand why Epicurus prefers to say that gods are like men, rather than men are like gods.
6. Bibliography
Bhasin, Kamala.  What is Patriarchy?.  New Delhi: Raj Press, 1993.
Biale, Rachel.  Women and Jewish Law: An Exploration of Women’s Issues in Halakhic Sources.  New York: Schocken, 1984.
Culver, Elsie T. Women in the World of Religion.  New York: Doubleday & Company Inc., 1967.
Fiorenza, Elizabeth Schussler.  In Memory of Her.  London: SCM Press, 1983.
Gill, Deboraj M and Barbara Cavaness.  God’s Women, Then and Now.  Oklahoma: Grace & Truth Publication, 2015.
Hununi, R.L, Ed. Transforming Theology for Empowering Women. Jorhat Barkataki & Co., Pvt. Ltd,1999.
Imchen, Narola.  Women in the History of Christianity.  Jorhat: TDCC, 2010.
Kennedy, Philip. Twentieth-Century Theologians a new introduction to modern Christian thought. New York: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd, 2010.
Kung, Hans. Women in Christianity. New York: Continuum, 2001.
MacHaffie, Barbara J.  Her Story: Women in Christian Tradition. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1986.
Tucker, Ruth A and Walter. L. Liefeld.  Daughters of the Church.  Secunderabad: OM-Authentic, 2006.


                [1] Marcus Tullius Cicero was a Roman Statesman and a philosopher. He is considered to be one of the Rome’s greatest orators and prose stylists.
                [2] Feminism is a belief that males and females are fundamentally equal in their status  as humans. It can involve the exposure of social and econonomic structures that exploit females, and the advocacy of their rights and privileges wherever and whenever they are denied.
                [3] Patriarchy is a system of organizing human societies in such a way that men, normally elderly men, govern younger men, women and children. The word patriarchy means ‘rule by a father’. A patriarch is ‘a father who rules’. In ancient Roman law, a paterfamilias (‘father of the family’) ruled everyone and everything belonging to a familia (‘family’), including enslaved people, land and animals.
                [4] Androcentrism is the belief that the male human being is the paradigm of the human species. Whereas patriarchy is a form of social structuring, androcentrism is a way of thinking. Both men and women can be androcentric in their understanding of humanity.
                [5] Misogyny is the hatred of women.
                [6] Gynophobia is the irrational fear of women.
                [7] Jewish feminist scholars like Judith Plaskow is on the opinion that Christian feminist literature and popular reasoning perpetuate anti-Jewish notions when extoling Jesus the feminist, over against patriarchal Judaism. 0n the other hand Christian feminist scholars cannot take Jewish warning seriously enough.
                [8] Rachel Biale, Women and Jewish Law: An Exploration of Women’s Issus in Halakhic Sources (New York: Schocken, 1984), 35.
                [9] Ruth A. Tucker and Walter. L. Liefeld,  Daughters of the Church (Secunderabad: OM-Authentic, 2006), 61.
                [10] Kamala Bhasin,  What is Patriarchy? ( New Delhi: Raj Press, 1993), 6.
                [11]Barbara J. MacHaffie, Her Story: Women in Christian Tradition (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1986), 7.
                [12] Narola Imchen, Women in the History of Christianity (Jorhat: TDCC, 2010), 29.
                [13] Hans Kung, Women in Christianity (New York: Continuum, 2001), 23.
                [14] Ruth A. Tucker and Walter. L. Liefeld,  Daughters of the Church (Secunderabad: OM-Authentic, 2006), 60.
                [15]Philip Kennedy, Twentieth-Century Theologians a new introduction to modern Christian thought (New York: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd, 2010), 183.
                [16] Narola Imchen, Women in the History of Christianity (Jorhat: TDCC, 2010), 33.
                [17] Philip Kennedy, Twentieth-Century Theologians a new introduction to modern Christian thought (New York: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd, 2010), 184.
                [18] Ruth A. Tucker and Walter. L. Liefeld,  Daughters of the Church (Secunderabad: OM-Authentic, 2006), 56.
                [19] Hans Kung, Women in Christianity (New York: Continuum, 2001), 25.
                [20] Narola Imchen, Women in the History of Christianity (Jorhat: TDCC, 2010), 33.
                [21] Elizabeth Schussler Fiorenza, In Memory of Her (London: SCM Press, 1983), 175.
                [22] Elizabeth Schussler Fiorenza, In Memory of Her (London: SCM Press, 1983), 176.
                [23] Ruth A. Tucker and Walter. L. Liefeld,  Daughters of the Church (Secunderabad: OM-Authentic, 2006), 86.
                [24] Narola Imchen, Women in the History of Christianity (Jorhat: TDCC, 2010), 39.
                [25]Ruth A. Tucker and Walter. L. Liefeld,  Daughters of the Church (Secunderabad: OM-Authentic, 2006), 111.
                [26] Elsie T. Culver, Women in the World of Religion ( New York: Doubleday & Company Inc., 1967), 68.
                [27] Hans Kung, Women in Christianity (New York: Continuum, 2001), 26.
                [28] Philip Kennedy, Twentieth-Century Theologians a new introduction to modern Christian thought (New York: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd, 2010), 185.
                [29] Narola Imchen, Women in the History of Christianity (Jorhat: TDCC, 2010), 42.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Current Post

எதையும் கண்டுகொள்ளாமல் இருப்பது ஒரு கலை! அதை கற்க 5 சுலபமான வழிகள்!

 எதையும் கண்டுகொள்ளாமல் இருப்பது ஒரு கலை! அதை கற்க 5 சுலபமான வழிகள்! உங்க அமைதியை குலைக்காத/கெடுக்காத எண்ணங்களை மட்டும் தேர்ந்தெடுங்கள்...! ...